Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:43168 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754474AbZHCTQ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2009 15:16:58 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: chris2553@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [Bug #13846] Possible regression in rt61pci driver Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:17:36 +0200 Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <200908031931.27427.chris2553@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <200908031931.27427.chris2553@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200908032117.36856.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 03 August 2009, Chris Clayton wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Sunday 02 August 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > (either way). > > > > The folks on the wireless project have concluded that the problem I reported is down to a hardware > problem when power saving is switched on on for my Belkin cardbus wireless adapter, so now I simply > turn power-saving off when wlan0 comes up. I did, however, ask whether anyone was going to fix the > fact that once power-saving turns the LEDs off, they never come back on again, but I haven't had an > answer. Is that a regression? I guess the answer is no, because power saving in the rt61pci driver > is feature that is new to 2.6.31. Well, IMO it is a regression, because it had worked before the power saving feature was added. > Should it be fixed? I think the answer is yes, but being unable to do it > myself, I probably don't have a vote :-) Well, if you remind the developers about the issue from time to time, it may help. ;-) Thanks, Rafael