Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:36320 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753339AbZHFSsF (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:48:05 -0400 Subject: Re: Best (ath9k) miniPCI card for testing overall AP functionality From: Pavel Roskin To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: "Philip A. Prindeville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Pen Li In-Reply-To: <43e72e890908061008k20895df8k636a921db20e83cd@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A7A0952.5020307@redfish-solutions.com> <1249555578.24439.38.camel@ct> <43e72e890908061008k20895df8k636a921db20e83cd@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:48:02 -0400 Message-Id: <1249584482.19169.10.camel@mj> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 10:08 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > By the way, AR9160 is supported by MadWifi, unlike AR9280. MadWifi is > > not actively developed, but if you need another reference point, you'll > > have it. > > Does MadWifi support 11n? :) Of could it doesn't, but neither does ath5k, and the subject mentions "overall AP functionality", not 802.11n support. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin