Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.220.217]:57598 "EHLO mail-fx0-f217.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752308AbZIHSaL (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2009 14:30:11 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so2858138fxm.37 for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AA6A2B3.2010300@lwfinger.net> Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:30:11 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_Stefanik?= CC: John Daiker , Michael Buesch , Dave Young , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de Subject: Re: b43 dma error References: <20090908134732.GA1936@darkstar> <200909081638.36897.mb@bu3sch.de> <4AA67009.4020400@lwfinger.net> <4AA69961.9010808@gmail.com> <4AA69F61.2040300@lwfinger.net> <69e28c910909081124v71e6fa1cy815a2366385051e6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <69e28c910909081124v71e6fa1cy815a2366385051e6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: G?bor Stefanik wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Larry Finger wrote: >> Your PHY and your radio are the same as mine. In fact, the one thing I >> noticed is that you are using i386 architecture, whereas mine is >> x86_64. I have not tested with i386. >> >> Has anyone run the LP PHY modifications with 32-bit architecture? > > Yes, me. (With the exact same card as John.) Is it a maximum memory issue? How much for you? John and Dave: Same question. Larry