Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.25]:14519 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752605AbZIJWTg (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:19:36 -0400 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 25so124809eya.19 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:19:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Ivo van Doorn To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: rt2x00: Hardcode TX ack timeout and consume time Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:19:35 +0200 Cc: "linux-wireless" , users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com References: <200909061514.23611.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <20090908183648.GE2617@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20090908183648.GE2617@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200909110019.35994.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 08 September 2009, John W. Linville wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 03:14:23PM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > rt2x00: Hardcode TX ack timeout and consume time > > > John, this patch has not yet been confirmed by any of the above bugzilla reports, > > but I do think this should be merged as soon as possible to 2.6.31 since this issue > > has been marked as regression for quite some time now. :) > > Well, given how late it is in the 2.6.31 cycle and the fact that this > problem has persisted for a while I think I'll just let this slip to > 2.6.32 -- good enough? Well preferably not, but I can sit it out and try to push it into -stable for 2.6.31.1. That might be the easiest solution which worked the last time when I had an urgent fix late in the release cycle as well. :) Ivo