Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f206.google.com ([209.85.219.206]:54165 "EHLO mail-ew0-f206.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752327AbZIIIFs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 04:05:48 -0400 Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so3471400ewy.17 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:05:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4AA6A2B3.2010300@lwfinger.net> References: <20090908134732.GA1936@darkstar> <200909081638.36897.mb@bu3sch.de> <4AA67009.4020400@lwfinger.net> <4AA69961.9010808@gmail.com> <4AA69F61.2040300@lwfinger.net> <69e28c910909081124v71e6fa1cy815a2366385051e6@mail.gmail.com> <4AA6A2B3.2010300@lwfinger.net> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:05:50 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: b43 dma error From: Dave Young To: Larry Finger Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Stefanik?= , John Daiker , Michael Buesch , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2009/9/9 Larry Finger : > Gábor Stefanik wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Larry Finger wrote: >>> Your PHY and your radio are the same as mine. In fact, the one thing I >>> noticed is that you are using i386 architecture, whereas mine is >>> x86_64. I have not tested with i386. >>> >>> Has anyone run the LP PHY modifications with 32-bit architecture? >> >> Yes, me. (With the exact same card as John.) > > Is it a maximum memory issue? How much for you? 1G memory for me. > > John and Dave: Same question. > > Larry > -- Regards dave