Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:59155 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751165AbZIJSuV (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:50:21 -0400 Subject: Re: iwlagn: order 2 page allocation failures From: reinette chatre To: Frans Pop Cc: Mel Gorman , Larry Finger , "John W. Linville" , Pekka Enberg , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" , Andrew Morton , "cl@linux-foundation.org" , "Krauss, Assaf" , Johannes Berg , "Abbas, Mohamed" In-Reply-To: <200909102043.17883.elendil@planet.nl> References: <200909060941.01810.elendil@planet.nl> <20090910090206.GA22276@csn.ul.ie> <1252606547.30150.304.camel@rc-desk> <200909102043.17883.elendil@planet.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:50:24 -0700 Message-Id: <1252608624.30150.312.camel@rc-desk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 11:43 -0700, Frans Pop wrote: > Looks good to me (from a user's perspective). Thank you very much for looking at it. > IIUC the first message is now only displayed if IWL debugging is > explicitly enabled, Correct. User will have to enable debug flag of 0x1. > It seems to me that, with debugging enabled, the "Failed to allocate SKB > buffer." message may get repeated, but I guess that's minor. Yes, it will be repeated. I did add a "net_ratelimit()" to it so it should not be too overwhelming. I did not care to limit it even more since we are now talking about a debug message as opposed to an error message on the console. > One nitpick. As you've made the message into sentences, "Only %u free > buffers remaining" should IMO also end with a period. Sorry - will fix. I will not post a new version to this thread for this issue, but it will be fixed in the next version I send out. Reinette