Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx51.mymxserver.com ([85.199.173.110]:19277 "EHLO
	mx51.mymxserver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754065AbZIWHG2 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:06:28 -0400
From: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
To: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: getting "ath5k phy0: noise floor calibration timeout"
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 09:05:36 +0200
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
References: <200909210902.23723.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> <1253662161.2510.59.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1253662161.2510.59.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Message-Id: <200909230905.37125.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

> I get that all the time, and have since 2.6.27 or earlier.  If it's a
> real bug, we should fix it, but if it's just an informational message,
> maybe we should silence it?

This is what I'd like to know: if it's a real but or not.