Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:12312 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753719AbZIAQPL (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:15:11 -0400 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.105]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:15:14 -0700 Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 09:15:13 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Larry Finger CC: Luis Rodriguez , "linville@tuxdriver.com" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "aquilaver@yahoo.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Dan Williams , Kai Engert , Jean Tourrilhes , Tim de Waal , Roy Marples , Alan Cox , Christian Lamparter , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Steinbrink , Tim Gardner , Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: mark prism54 as deprecated and mark for removal Message-ID: <20090901161513.GD8261@mosca> References: <1251819116-10004-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <4A9D469B.9060005@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <4A9D469B.9060005@lwfinger.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 09:06:51AM -0700, Larry Finger wrote: > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > The preferred modules is p54 which also supports FullMAC > > This needs to be "modules are" or "module is". I know p54 is really a > family, but I think you specifically mean p54pci here. Will fix. > > PCI / Cardbus devices. We schedule removal for 2.6.34. Reason > > to remove this is no one really is testing prism54 anymore, > > and while it works p54 provides support for the same hardware. > === > p54pci? That would make it clearer, yes thanks. > > It should be noted I have been told some FullMAC devices may not > > have worked with the SoftMAC driver but to date we have yet to > > recieve a single bug report regarding this. If there are users > ======= > receive ack > > out there please let us know! > ========= > > Those words can be removed. > > Otherwise, ACK. Thanks for the review, will resend with the changes. Luis