Return-path: Received: from mail-yx0-f187.google.com ([209.85.210.187]:49928 "EHLO mail-yx0-f187.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753159AbZJ2TpD (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:45:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200910291514.40318.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200910291212.41656.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200910291435.54203.bzolnier@gmail.com> <84144f020910290652n2e75827dk698b238b6bd1cbed@mail.gmail.com> <200910291514.40318.bzolnier@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:45:07 +0200 Message-ID: <84144f020910291245l1a7a3fd6o8822ecd4ce3b5504@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 From: Pekka Enberg To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: David Miller , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Bart, On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> lots of cleanups to the staging drivers, why not direct some of that >> energy to the drivers/net/wireless ones? > > When did we start to apply "fix it yourself" rule instead of "submitter > should fix it" one to the _new_ code.. Don't be silly, I didn't say that. I was simply pointing out that your time would probably be better spent in improving the "proper" ralink wireless drivers but if you _really_ prefer to spend your time in pointless arguments, go ahead. It should be pretty obvious by now that the best way to improve things is to work with the relevant maintainers, not against them. (Unless you wish your work to be ignored, of course.) Pekka