Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f218.google.com ([209.85.220.218]:33615 "EHLO mail-fx0-f218.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbZJPRP3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:15:29 -0400 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: Current status of rt2800usb and staging/rt2870 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:13:43 +0200 Cc: "John W. Linville" , Dan Williams , Ivo van Doorn , Ozan =?utf-8?q?=C3=87a=C4=9Flayan?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel" References: <4AD46380.9020308@pardus.org.tr> <200910151647.49050.bzolnier@gmail.com> <43e72e890910151206y59353608p5065f72eebd72ab@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43e72e890910151206y59353608p5065f72eebd72ab@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Message-Id: <200910161913.44109.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 15 October 2009 21:06:55 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > wrote: > > On Wednesday 14 October 2009 18:55:23 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > >> I hear fishing in Poland is great this time of year. > > > > It got quite cold this week so I thought that I would try to fish > > the commit that broke Atheros AR9285 in Linus' tree (works in 2.6.31) > > and make recent kernels finally work on my laptop.. > > > > Seems like there are two regressions actually: > > > > - later one making association/authentication impossible > > And you reported this when and where? > > > - earlier one making transfers stall > > And you reported this when and where? > > Curious how the issues you mention now spreading across sound and > wireless do not get fixed or seriously addressed. Have you considered > your tactics are perhaps not the best? Please look closely at chosen examples and you'll see a lot of insight telling you that users' experience is not granted by having clean code or by having features which are not consider crucial instead of reliable basic functionality. I'm pretty sure that if you try F12 w/ AR9285 you will be able to reproduce and fix at least some of above mentioned problems. I just used the occasion to raise them and make people aware of bugs before they hit users in final 2.6.32. I'm not as much interested in fixing existing problems as in seeing why they happened in the first place and how the process can be improved to prevent them / making tracking of them easy for non-developers (so more people can contribute to the project and developers have more time to add new features). I also don't have time to care about every single Linux bug that I encounter (I hit quite a lot of them), bug-reporting is a thankless and very time consuming work. This is in no means trying to implicit that you're doing bad job. Quite the contrary -- I think that your work on Atheros support is much needed. The point is that there is a lot of room for in release management process of wireless/networking (it has been more-or-less unchanged for a long time while other subsystems, i.e. x86, are constantly looking into improvements). This is not something that you can change alone so please do not hesitate to give feedback about this to your upstream maintainers so they are aware of the need for improvements.