Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:33338 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751670AbZJ2MOp (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:14:45 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20091029.051509.119751790.davem@davemloft.net> To: bzolnier@gmail.com Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200910291212.41656.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <20091028211031.GF2856@tuxdriver.com> <200910282256.00407.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200910291212.41656.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:12:41 +0100 > What is even more disappointing (especially after all that "working with" > preaching) is that the patch is now in net-next-2.6.. John is the wireless maintainer, I take his tree in since the changes in there have his blessing. If you have a problem with some change in there, work it out with him and he'll send the fixed up changes to me thereafterwards. I don't really see what the big deal is, any change can be reverted.