Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx51.mymxserver.com ([85.199.173.110]:35015 "EHLO
	mx51.mymxserver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755286AbZJOG4Q (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:56:16 -0400
From: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: no  cookies in cfg80211_send_ABCD()
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:54:49 +0200
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
References: <200910140906.16111.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> <20091014200837.GA11962@tuxdriver.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091014200837.GA11962@tuxdriver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-Id: <200910150854.49914.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

> This doesn't appear to be any different (other than the
> subject) than the previous version?

Right, but VGERs simple spam filter prevented the first version 
to go to the mailing-list. He didn't like the triple-X in 
cfg80211_send_XXX() in the subject ...