Return-path: Received: from mail.deathmatch.net ([72.66.92.28]:4552 "EHLO mail.deathmatch.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754350AbZJKNbN (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:31:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 09:30:10 -0400 From: Bob Copeland To: Richard Zidlicky Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.31.[12] ath5k regression Message-ID: <20091011133010.GA21494@hash.localnet> References: <20090621134954.GA31505@linux-m68k.org> <20090621180447.GA29469@hash.localnet> <20090623174616.GA3914@linux-m68k.org> <20090623202541.GA3635@hash.localnet> <20090625083636.GA6323@linux-m68k.org> <20090705123105.GE2132@hash.localnet> <20091009143922.GA7848@linux-m68k.org> <20091010125824.GA18841@hash.localnet> <20091011122616.GA27105@linux-m68k.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20091011122616.GA27105@linux-m68k.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 02:26:16PM +0200, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > thanks, compiling it right now. Not quite sure - which version of this > > > - ret = ath5k_hw_reset(ah, sc->opmode, sc->curchan, true); > > > + ret = ath5k_hw_reset(ah, sc->opmode, sc->curchan, chan != NULL); > > is it supposed to be tested with? The "chan != NULL" case. The patch should apply against latest wireless-testing (but will probably work with linus-2.6). -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com