Return-path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:28496 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754293AbZJ2OP1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:15:27 -0400 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:14:40 +0100 Cc: David Miller , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com References: <200910291212.41656.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200910291435.54203.bzolnier@gmail.com> <84144f020910290652n2e75827dk698b238b6bd1cbed@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84144f020910290652n2e75827dk698b238b6bd1cbed@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200910291514.40318.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Thursday 29 October 2009 14:52:50 Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Bart, > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > wrote: > >> I'm saying that you should work with John to have him send a revert or > >> whatever to me. > > > > This is your responsibility to deal with your downstream maintainers, > > not mine and since you have accepted John's patch I'm asking you to > > revert rt2800pci patch from your tree. > > So why don't you just send a patch to fix it up? I see you're doing "git revert a9b3a9f" done. Dave, if you have problems with executing the command locally I'll be happy to supply you with the patch. > lots of cleanups to the staging drivers, why not direct some of that > energy to the drivers/net/wireless ones? When did we start to apply "fix it yourself" rule instead of "submitter should fix it" one to the _new_ code.. rt2800 drivers have their maintainers and I would like to know what they are doing besides complaining about users and staging tree.. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz