Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:64869 "EHLO mail-iw0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756855AbZJ3UDf (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:03:35 -0400 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so2389988iwn.4 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:03:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1094614475.20091030230028@mail.ru> References: <1094614475.20091030230028@mail.ru> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:03:20 -0700 Message-ID: <43e72e890910301303r67fea6b1m3e04b267aceec66b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: ieee80211_tx_status: headroom too small To: Nikolai ZHUBR Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Nikolai ZHUBR wrote: > Hello people, > > I'm using compat-wireless-2009-09-14 with 2.6.25.20 and I have > recently noticed lots of these in syslog: > > ieee80211_tx_status: headroom too small > ieee80211_tx_status: headroom too small > ieee80211_tx_status: headroom too small > > The wireless (access point) works fine, though maybe not very > fast. However, this warning somehow bothers me. Is it important? > Does it mean something critical? Maybe I should just comment > it out in the code? I don't like syslog being filled up this > way... You're lucky it even worked on 2.6.25. Luis