Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:48645 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752801AbZJ2M6h (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:58:37 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20091029.055901.24976117.davem@davemloft.net> To: bzolnier@gmail.com Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200910291345.05888.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200910291212.41656.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091029.051509.119751790.davem@davemloft.net> <200910291345.05888.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:45:05 +0100 > That *I* should be fixing the patch in question instead of the > submitter? I'm saying that you should work with John to have him send a revert or whatever to me.