Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.156]:50713 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752997AbZJ2Vtm (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:49:42 -0400 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:48:42 +0100 Cc: David Miller , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com References: <200910291212.41656.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200910291514.40318.bzolnier@gmail.com> <84144f020910291245l1a7a3fd6o8822ecd4ce3b5504@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84144f020910291245l1a7a3fd6o8822ecd4ce3b5504@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200910292248.42229.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 29 October 2009 20:45:07 Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Bart, > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > wrote: > >> lots of cleanups to the staging drivers, why not direct some of that > >> energy to the drivers/net/wireless ones? > > > > When did we start to apply "fix it yourself" rule instead of "submitter > > should fix it" one to the _new_ code.. > > Don't be silly, I didn't say that. Sorry, I must have misunderstood you. > I was simply pointing out that your time would probably be better > spent in improving the "proper" ralink wireless drivers but if you Thanks for the concern. However recent discussions made my realize how I should really be spending my time effectively way too well. > _really_ prefer to spend your time in pointless arguments, go ahead. I don't think that my technical arguments are pointless. Quite the contrary, I'm pretty confident that addressing my review concerns would result in better RT28x00 / RT30x0 support in the very near future. > It should be pretty obvious by now that the best way to improve things > is to work with the relevant maintainers, not against them. (Unless > you wish your work to be ignored, of course.) I work with a lot of other maintainers. I would say that providing valuable review feedback is also "working with" (at least I would be very happy with such feedback in my projects). -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz