Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:64162 "EHLO mail-bw0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757142AbZJ3LGP (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:06:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:06:16 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Johannes Berg Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Pekka Enberg , David Miller , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 Message-ID: <20091030110616.GB6150@ff.dom.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1256886023.3555.5.camel@johannes.local> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 30-10-2009 08:00, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:48 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > >> I don't think that my technical arguments are pointless. >> >> Quite the contrary, I'm pretty confident that addressing my review concerns >> would result in better RT28x00 / RT30x0 support in the very near future. > > So you know how to make the driver better, whine that it doesn't work, > but don't help out either. Hey, good way to collaborate! > >>> It should be pretty obvious by now that the best way to improve things >>> is to work with the relevant maintainers, not against them. (Unless >>> you wish your work to be ignored, of course.) >> I work with a lot of other maintainers. I would say that providing valuable >> review feedback is also "working with" (at least I would be very happy with >> such feedback in my projects). > > Face it though, people have read your feedback, thought about it, and > decided to disagree. You seem to have a childish problem with that, > appealing to higher authority to get your way just makes you look more > childish. There are various ways to disagree, and ignoring by John questions from a merited developer both in this referenced lkml and current threads looks at least strange (if not offensive) as well. Jarek P.