From: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
To: Holger Schurig <hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rt2x00: Implement support for rt2800pci
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:31:11 +0200
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	John Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com,
	Alban Browaeys <prahal@yahoo.com>,
	Benoit PAPILLAULT <benoit.papillault@free.fr>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>,
	Luis Correia <luis.f.correia@gmail.com>,
	Mattias Nissler <mattias.nissler@gmx.de>,
	Mark Asselstine <asselsm@gmail.com>,
	Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <200910152137.58164.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200910181859.22413.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <200910200858.54683.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
In-Reply-To: <200910200858.54683.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <200910201831.12285.IvDoorn@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday 20 October 2009, Holger Schurig wrote:
> > I don't agree on this, for starters the whole "abstraction
> > layer as done in the staging driver, really obfuscated the code
> > in multiple areas 
> 
> Ivo, you could look at Orinoco or Libertas. Both WLAN drivers 
> support a multitude of different hardware (Libertas: CF/PCMCIA, 
> SDIO, SD, USB and Orinoco: CF/PCMCIA, PCI, PPC_PMAC). And both 
> have hardware abstraction layers that don't suck, obfuscate or 
> create lots of duplicate code.

Thanks,

> So AFAIK it's not the question *IF* to do hardware abstraction 
> but only a question *HOW* to do it in an intelligent way. Don't 
> luck at one bad implementation and disregard the whole 
> concept :-)

Oh I completely agree, I am not against the extra abstraction layer,
but I do want a nice looking solution. :) I'll take a look at the Orinoco approach.

Thanks,

Ivo