Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:57681 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752977AbZJBHkl (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Oct 2009 03:40:41 -0400 Subject: Re: 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.31 From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Adrian Bunk , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Natalie Protasevich , Kernel Testers List , Network Development , Linux ACPI , Linux PM List , Linux SCSI List , Linux Wireless List , DRI In-Reply-To: <9UCePxij8cB.A.VCG.-3SxKB@chimera> References: <9UCePxij8cB.A.VCG.-3SxKB@chimera> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:08:59 +0530 Message-Id: <1254469139.3531.19.camel@ht.satnam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello Rafael, On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 21:26 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > [Notes: > > * Here's the first summary report of known regressions from 2.6.31. There's > not too many of them at the moment, which is nice. > > * We're still getting quite a number of reports of regressions from 2.6.30 and > it's been that way since 2.6.31 was released. For details please see the > summary report of regressions 2.6.30 -> 2.6.31 that will follow shortly.] > > This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.31, for which there > are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, > please let me know. > > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.31, please let me know > either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the > entries below are invalid. > > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to > this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the > issue. > > > Listed regressions statistics: > > Date Total Pending Unresolved > ---------------------------------------- > 2009-10-02 22 15 9 > > > Unresolved regressions > ---------------------- > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14299 > Subject : oops in wireless, iwl3945 related? > Submitter : Pavel Machek > Date : 2009-09-29 17:12 (3 days old) > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125424439725743&w=4 > If you add one more entry say "Suspected commit :" then it will be great and will solve regressions much faster. You can request submitter to submit 'suspected commit' by git bisect and also specify git bisect links like : (for more information about git bisect check http://kerneltrap.org/node/11753) Thanks, -- JSR