Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.221.174]:51293 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753813AbZJ2Nwq (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:52:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200910291435.54203.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200910291212.41656.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200910291345.05888.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091029.055901.24976117.davem@davemloft.net> <200910291435.54203.bzolnier@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:52:50 +0200 Message-ID: <84144f020910290652n2e75827dk698b238b6bd1cbed@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 From: Pekka Enberg To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: David Miller , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Bart, On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> I'm saying that you should work with John to have him send a revert or >> whatever to me. > > This is your responsibility to deal with your downstream maintainers, > not mine and since you have accepted John's patch I'm asking you to > revert rt2800pci patch from your tree. So why don't you just send a patch to fix it up? I see you're doing lots of cleanups to the staging drivers, why not direct some of that energy to the drivers/net/wireless ones? Pekka