Return-path: Received: from mx03.syneticon.net ([78.111.66.105]:33181 "EHLO mx03.syneticon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754683AbZJLIN6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 04:13:58 -0400 Message-ID: <4AD2E511.1050808@wpkg.org> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:13:05 +0200 From: Tomasz Chmielewski MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Copeland CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ath5k AP kernel panic when client uses SCP References: <4AD21AB4.6010208@wpkg.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Bob Copeland wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: >> The AP is Asus WL-500gP, it's a MIPS platform, running 2.6.31.1 kernel, >> hostapd v0.6.9. >> >> I can reproduce the issue reliably. >> >> Let me know if you need more info here. > > Yes, please -- it would really be helpful if instead of just the addresses > we have all the function names in the stack trace. Or at least what is > at 8006f058 and 80276190. We've had a couple of reports of unaligned > accesses but I haven't yet seen a useful stack trace. OK, will try to send it later today. >> [67359.700000] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [67359.710000] WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:1566 0x80280890() >> [67359.710000] b44: caps=(0x0, 0x0) len=80 data_len=0 ip_summed=1 >> [67359.720000] Modules linked in: tun sch_sfq cls_fw sch_htb ipt_MASQUERADE >> iptable_nat nf_nat xt_MARK iptable_mangle ipt_ULOG xt_recent >> nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag1 > > Did you replace the wireless device? I don't see ath5k in the > above list; IIRC that AP is originally some broadcom chipset. The AP device comes with a broadcom wireless card, which doesn't work well. So I replaced broadcom with an ath5k card. ath5k and other modules were probably "eaten" by the terminal/minicom/konsole/whatever. This is the list of modules which should be loaded when the panic occurs: # lsmod Module Size Used by tun 12160 2 sch_sfq 4496 1 cls_fw 3216 1 sch_htb 12480 1 ipt_MASQUERADE 976 1 iptable_nat 2800 1 nf_nat 12496 2 ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat xt_MARK 912 1 iptable_mangle 1008 1 ipt_ULOG 4144 1 xt_recent 5408 9 nf_conntrack_ipv4 4560 7 iptable_nat,nf_nat nf_defrag_ipv4 624 1 nf_conntrack_ipv4 xt_state 784 4 nf_conntrack 46640 5 ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,nf_nat,nf_conntrack_ipv4,xt_state xt_tcpudp 1888 5 iptable_filter 768 1 ip_tables 8848 3 iptable_nat,iptable_mangle,iptable_filter x_tables 9648 8 ipt_MASQUERADE,iptable_nat,xt_MARK,ipt_ULOG,xt_recent,xt_state,xt_tcpudp,ip_tables ath5k 131616 0 mac80211 130208 1 ath5k ath 6256 1 ath5k ohci_hcd 17344 0 uhci_hcd 18048 0 cfg80211 72000 3 ath5k,mac80211,ath >> [67360.080000] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint >> [67360.560000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt > > Why's it tainted? I can't remember and can't check right now if > TAINT_WARN counts. Yes, WARN taints the kernel. -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org