Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:57386
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753977AbZJ2NxM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:53:12 -0400
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20091029.065336.119302168.davem@davemloft.net>
To: bzolnier@gmail.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <200910291435.54203.bzolnier@gmail.com>
References: <200910291345.05888.bzolnier@gmail.com>
	<20091029.055901.24976117.davem@davemloft.net>
	<200910291435.54203.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:35:54 +0100

> This is your responsibility to deal with your downstream maintainers,
> not mine and since you have accepted John's patch I'm asking you to
> revert rt2800pci patch from your tree.

That's not how it works Bart.  You should not be asking 'me' to do
anything on wireless bits, there is absolutely no reason to bypass
John in the workflow.