Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:48308 "EHLO
	fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754764AbZJ3F7S (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:59:18 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <200910292248.42229.bzolnier@gmail.com>
References: <200910291212.41656.bzolnier@gmail.com>
	 <200910291514.40318.bzolnier@gmail.com>
	 <84144f020910291245l1a7a3fd6o8822ecd4ce3b5504@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200910292248.42229.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:59:21 +0200
Message-ID: <84144f020910292259g4635e3c3v652a27f8ac4d42de@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linville@tuxdriver.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Bart,

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> _really_ prefer to spend your time in pointless arguments, go ahead.
>
> I don't think that my technical arguments are pointless.
>
> Quite the contrary, I'm pretty confident that addressing my review concerns
> would result in better RT28x00 / RT30x0 support in the very near future.

I don't think your technical arguments are pointless either. However,
asking Dave to revert something over John and then arguing about it is
pointless and will likely just piss people off and make them ignore
you.

                        Pekka