Return-path: Received: from mail-px0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]:55144 "EHLO mail-px0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752822AbZJAUT6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2009 16:19:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20091001170722.GC2895@tuxdriver.com> References: <20090924180048.14503.9579.stgit@tikku> <43e72e890909241320j592e347die8a14f8bdd962ffb@mail.gmail.com> <20090925044258.GA2722@tuxdriver.com> <43e72e890909250953r1714c79bsa679b96ca6f5797@mail.gmail.com> <20091001011340.GA3123@tuxdriver.com> <87fxa3qjt2.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> <20091001151820.GA2895@tuxdriver.com> <873a63qe6e.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> <20091001170722.GC2895@tuxdriver.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:56:40 +0000 Message-ID: <43e72e890910011256v18b30e7ck420ce80b5d35fdcb@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cfg80211: firmware and hardware version To: "John W. Linville" , "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" Cc: Kalle Valo , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 5:07 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > I don't predict a huge problem if there are > valid extensions required for use by wireless drivers in the future. > But for now, I'd like to see us make use of some of the debugging > facilities available in the ethtool API -- hopefully the iwlwifi guys > are listening... ;-) Does the same apply to wimax then? Ethtool for 802.11 and wimax? Eh. Luis