Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:59127 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751693AbZKWQAl (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:00:41 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.32] rfkill: fix miscdev ops From: Johannes Berg To: Maxim Levitsky Cc: John Linville , linux-wireless , iwlwifi maling list In-Reply-To: <1258985555.7236.6.camel@maxim-laptop> References: <1258968499.3271.5.camel@maxim-laptop> <1258972050.7094.140.camel@johannes.local> <1258973082.3675.0.camel@maxim-laptop> <1258973362.7094.151.camel@johannes.local> <1258985555.7236.6.camel@maxim-laptop> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gctnGuPyW05OQqwNQDMX" Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:00:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1258992014.7094.175.camel@johannes.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-gctnGuPyW05OQqwNQDMX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 16:12 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > Not important, however I had seen that iwlwifi now chokes on reload, > sometimes with this: >=20 >=20 > [ 830.333386] iwl3945: Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 3945ABG/BG Network Connecti= on driver for Linux, 1.2.26kds > [ 830.333407] iwl3945: Copyright(c) 2003-2009 Intel Corporation > [ 830.333536] iwl3945 0000:06:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> = IRQ 19 > [ 830.374979] iwl3945 0000:06:00.0: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 0 802= .11a channels > [ 830.374995] iwl3945 0000:06:00.0: Detected Intel Wireless WiFi Link 39= 45BG > [ 830.375163] iwl3945 0000:06:00.0: irq 32 for MSI/MSI-X > [ 830.376859] phy0: Selected rate control algorithm 'iwl-3945-rs' > [ 830.427214] iwl3945 0000:06:00.0: firmware: requesting iwlwifi-3945-2.= ucode > [ 830.526945] iwl3945 0000:06:00.0: loaded firmware version 15.32.2.9 > [ 830.544236] CE: hpet increasing min_delta_ns to 15000 nsec > [ 830.575694] iwl3945 0000:06:00.0: BSM uCode verification failed at add= r 0x00003800+0 (of 900), is 0xa5a5a5a2, s/b 0xf802020 I'd really appreciate if you started separate threads for separate issues -- this can be in no way related to the fix except maybe that the fix makes it possible for you to run into this whereas before it'd crash :) johannes --=-gctnGuPyW05OQqwNQDMX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABAgAGBQJLCrGKAAoJEODzc/N7+QmatksP/A0Az5W/Dnn3KY45+8JhqiaC dWqS7qKgVh75xMktMXiaYvfVIuTHh6BRnITvhtkZCyhGj80BXXDgy7I2XSZQsGUF xcEaxfRoRyYFb20ie/nODdz7mthmMv8W3IOufWyVlDHtrbsyodAvX6OjbIY0JkZq iU3GFysAoGrdwEIWSiypkBaEwGDGczG0v5rv/liXfQ3tdf/8nUE4Fwl81IB2ff30 PNR5gupElX8FPtFMXj+y2Gs4PUf6FIa9xSkeYvk03r8UF1PZCBK2wdE+i4gXtOkZ ICrjmBSjz0MqW4TqdTPWYxYFTGuNBypwaFS5qmMM0kVWNrCC50txGl1pLbnpTFyX V05Gm5vZ6jY317HBmCOx1pFWVoswRC5T/corzrdBuoLpJsrsLVAaOB4sTnqgLu8y p4vbg0XlBnbA7tWHfvJ2G+7LWarE3j7BwM8qiDsvjv9iX629RVqREuPdNzqKTaPy Sg7s2VNDX4gBBuuQxZCCVY9Z9DapgE6eLHpqmlvpph+LCrFNkJCPif01yy6+j41I xcsxoJgmmmdvstSQntCE3cERTTtswPqQD8Fd1XkXMMyQ+5+fLynO4LGUlgauyaGf mxubYad/M83RRyOt0ppzLHhj/iWFhi6A1999sC9jl1CwFXPCwWreNzWA2F38S2zG 88vkqCSqruBhOBps+ONE =GlFe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gctnGuPyW05OQqwNQDMX--