Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:54241 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751145AbZKCPpD (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:45:03 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 07:43:02 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Marcel Holtmann cc: Dmitry Torokhov , David Miller , johannes@sipsolutions.net, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please consider reverting 7d930bc33653d5592dc386a76a38f39c2e962344 In-Reply-To: <1257262588.3420.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: References: <20091103053156.GA3212@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20091102.224957.32364226.davem@davemloft.net> <20091103065238.GE3212@core.coreip.homeip.net> <1257232587.3420.55.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1257262588.3420.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > no questions that it needs fixed, I agree with you. However just blindly > reverting something, because it fixes it for one or two people, might > have side effects that causes more problems than the revert would > actually fix. Stop whining. Really. Everybody understands that it should be fixed. That's not the question. But it should be fixed _quickly_. In this case, I have a bisection report FROM TWO DAYS AGO. And I'm still kicking myself for not just reverting that piece-of-shit commit then, because I spent the time to look at the oops and the commit, and could tell that it was crap. Instead, I _did_ wait for the subsystem maintainer to get around to it. As a result of waiting, I've now wasted time for a lot of other people. So stop your claptrap. You're wrong. I would suggest you now thank Dmitry, and ask his forgiveness for (a) wasting his time and (b) then berating him for it. Linus