Return-path: Received: from li59-9.members.linode.com ([97.107.129.9]:40432 "EHLO erley.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757410AbZKYPgz (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:36:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:36:59 -0500 From: To: Simon Perreault Cc: Rui Paulo , Subject: Re: Hardware for 802.11s In-Reply-To: <4B0D4E98.5090600@viagenie.ca> References: <4B0C5E6F.5040302@viagenie.ca> <4B0C6493.7010805@erley.org> <4B0D360A.3080801@viagenie.ca> <4B0D4E98.5090600@viagenie.ca> Message-ID: <66c7012a2fea8a9dd6fbdf30d0a44410@127.0.0.1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:34:48 -0500, Simon Perreault wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote, on 2009-11-25 09:45: >> Try iwlist mesh0 scanning. > > The output of that looks very much like that of "iw dev mesh0 scan" with > different formatting. > > It doesn't help. "iw dev mesh0 station dump" is still empty. Did you do that on both ends? What is the full procedure you're using to set up the mesh interfaces on the nodes? Pat Erley