Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:61180 "EHLO mail-iw0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756126AbZKBRrh (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:47:37 -0500 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so3485409iwn.4 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:47:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4AEF14E9.7060902@nbd.name> References: <19182.33851.980271.360757@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1257151486.3555.161.camel@johannes.local> <20091102153614.GC14046@tuxdriver.com> <4AEF14E9.7060902@nbd.name> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:47:22 -0800 Message-ID: <43e72e890911020947i3a9ea736ve95fa6b1fac724a4@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Fix IBSS merge To: Felix Fietkau Cc: "John W. Linville" , Johannes Berg , Sujith , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > John W. Linville wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:44:46AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: >>> On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 12:33 +0530, Sujith wrote: >>> > Currently, in IBSS mode, a single creator would go into >>> > a loop trying to merge/scan. This happens because the IBSS timer is >>> > rearmed on finishing a scan and the subsequent >>> > timer invocation requests another scan immediately. >>> > >>> > This patch fixes this issue by checking if we have just completed >>> > a scan run trying to merge with other IBSS networks. >>> >>> Heh, how many people do we need to fix IBSS? :) >> >> Yeah, no kidding...I suspect that actual IBSS users are few, and a >> substantial number of those are doing crazy things with it! :-) > Yeah, we're doing crazy things like mesh networks of few hundred > nodes... something that 11s isn't really suitable for. :-) Anyone know if this applies for 32? Luis