Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:10029 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753021AbZKJIBS (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:01:18 -0500 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1053088fga.1 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:01:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:00:50 +0100 Message-ID: From: Holger Schurig To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless Subject: Re: erraneous connect with short-slot-time fails In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Side node: > wlan0 (phy #4): auth 00:1b:d4:44:35:90 -> 00:15:e9:84:1a:54 status: 0: Successful > wlan0 (phy #4): assoc 00:1b:d4:44:35:90 -> 00:15:e9:84:1a:54 status: 25: Association request rejected due to requesting station not supporting the short slot time option > wlan0 (phy #4): failed to connect to 00:1b:d4:44:35:90, status: 25: Association request rejected due to requesting station not supporting the short slot time option in this case, I had a case where the AP did send an authorization response with success status, but an association response with an error condition. You once asked if I tested that. Now I did, and it looked like mac80211+wpa_supplicant did the right thing in this case. -- http://www.holgerschurig.de