Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:65500 "EHLO mail-iw0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750919AbZKZVtG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:49:06 -0500 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so643610iwn.33 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:49:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <69e28c910911260902p5385cd33wa0d5e00199235dd1@mail.gmail.com> References: <69e28c910911260902p5385cd33wa0d5e00199235dd1@mail.gmail.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:48:51 -0800 Message-ID: <43e72e890911261348g32edb851obbba8e265ad22e95@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [question] ath9k: 11n monitor mode To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Stefanik?= Cc: Ming Lei , ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Matteo Croce Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2009/11/26 Gábor Stefanik : > I don't know exactly, but a while ago there was a discussion about how > to represent HT rates in Radiotap. AFAIK mac80211 refuses to forward > HT packets to monitor interfaces as they don't have a valid CCK or > OFDM rate. Matteo added a suggested field for radiotap for MCS rates: http://www.radiotap.org/suggested-fields/MCS If approved it could mean then parsing MCS rates. Luis