Return-path: Received: from mail.klingt.org ([86.59.21.178]:37555 "EHLO klingt.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752477AbZK2R2Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:28:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4B12AF38.4090609@klingt.org> Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:28:24 +0100 From: Tim Blechmann MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIFN0ZWZhbmlr?= CC: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: rt61pci bug References: <4AE43028.30703@klingt.org> <4B127E9E.1090008@klingt.org> <69e28c910911290859mc1da58ree7b2d3fa8dc371d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <69e28c910911290859mc1da58ree7b2d3fa8dc371d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig043904BB3525E705BB5D3F0C" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig043904BB3525E705BB5D3F0C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Could you please try a bisect between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32-rc5? That > should reveal the faulty commit. can you give me some hints, which source files, i should pay attention to= ? thnx, tim --=20 tim@klingt.org http://tim.klingt.org The first question I ask myself when something doesn't seem to be beautiful is why do I think it's not beautiful. And very shortly you discover that there is no reason. John Cage. --------------enig043904BB3525E705BB5D3F0C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEQEARECAAYFAksSrzgACgkQdL+4qsZfVsvU1ACNEfLfCuXAGIJXmZNI25wCzX7P AJ9cIAyw/vxZoCM9TFlRasUEYaUMWQ== =EYjB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig043904BB3525E705BB5D3F0C--