Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50806 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757998AbZKDUCf (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:02:35 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] libertas if_usb: Fix crash on 64-bit machines From: Dan Williams To: David Woodhouse Cc: "John W. Linville" , Christian Lamparter , Larry Finger , libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, davem@davemloft.net In-Reply-To: <1257363418.22822.28.camel@macbook.infradead.org> References: <1256924714.4030.44.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <200910301944.14740.chunkeey@googlemail.com> <1256928681.4030.112.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <200910302026.47131.chunkeey@googlemail.com> <20091104191642.GB10786@tuxdriver.com> <1257363418.22822.28.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:01:43 -0800 Message-Id: <1257364903.14545.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 19:36 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 14:16 -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > > Is anyone evaluating these suggestions? Should I be expecting > > properly formatted patch emails? > > The suggestions make sense, but not for stable. Let's fix the crasher > bug first, and worry about the rest later. Sounds good to me... Dan