Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:56074 "EHLO mail-bw0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755007AbZKMIze (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:55:34 -0500 Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so3156106bwz.21 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:55:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1258097485.3899.76.camel@johannes.local> References: <40101cc30911120618m5d9acd34pf6aa9ec89c6c40b8@mail.gmail.com> <20091112154440.GD19349@tux> <43e72e890911120749n72360f0btfb058ab3a521eabb@mail.gmail.com> <40101cc30911121118h17db32a1y61edac1a4c0aec24@mail.gmail.com> <1258054304.3899.36.camel@johannes.local> <40101cc30911121418h4109d62bv763bed2036446901@mail.gmail.com> <1258097485.3899.76.camel@johannes.local> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:55:37 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Possible memory leak in ath9k monitor mode injection From: Lorenzo Bianconi To: Johannes Berg Cc: rodriguez@atheros.com, technoboy85@gmail.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2009/11/13 Johannes Berg : > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 23:18 +0100, Matteo Croce wrote: > >> kmalloc-64 is definitely getting fat > > Is it the same with ath5k? > > I don't see any allocations like that in mac80211. > > johannes > Yes, I tested ath5k/mac80211 and ath9k/mac80211 and both show the same problem whereas madwifi/net80211, tested with the same module, has not memory leak. Lorenzo