Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:46864 "EHLO mail-bw0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932577AbZLGPLF (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:11:05 -0500 Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so3553442bwz.21 for ; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:11:11 -0800 (PST) To: David Acker Cc: Dan Williams , Greg Oliver , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, patrik.flykt@nokia.com Subject: Re: WMM classification guideline for applications? References: <87d42u6dnd.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> <4B19276F.5080604@roinet.com> <878wdi69u9.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> <4B1933F5.2010408@roinet.com> <51058d550912040856u5d413a06n40412f8f56eb4b9@mail.gmail.com> <1259954135.27022.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4B196AA7.3040603@roinet.com> From: Kalle Valo Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 17:11:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4B196AA7.3040603@roinet.com> (David Acker's message of "Fri\, 04 Dec 2009 15\:01\:43 -0500") Message-ID: <87iqci4y5w.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Acker writes: > Going with IPv4 DSCP may be a bit problematic. See > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=125875775229644&w=2 and > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10789 . Thanks, these are good links. I don't see this as an obstacle, though. If we have issues, we'll fix them. This QoS support is such a mess that if we want to do this properly, there is no way to avoid some pain. -- Kalle Valo