Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:47723 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756075AbZLNSDo (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:03:44 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:03:45 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20091214.100345.57458443.davem@davemloft.net> To: bzolnier@gmail.com Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Revised wireless tree management practices From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200912141720.11465.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200912141559.29282.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091214.072323.215080360.davem@davemloft.net> <200912141720.11465.bzolnier@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:20:11 +0100 > Well, in theory all maintainers should be testing -next kernels > so nothing should change also in this regard. You conveniently did not quote and respond to my comments showing that you can ask git tools to seperate out the changesets for you, regardless of what subsystem maintainers decide to do. Power is in your hands, really. :-)