Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:34192 "EHLO mga01.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751627AbZL2Aqc (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:46:32 -0500
Subject: Re: Intel 4965 HT rates
From: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor?= Stefanik <netrolller.3d@gmail.com>
Cc: "Guy, Wey-Yi W" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
	Valentin Manea <linux-wireless@mrs.ro>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <69e28c910912281233v220e9896t5686111030d5f30@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E9954878DD1FB34FAE5187FB88C58A357683393C@orsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
	 <1261363447.12157.624.camel@debian>
	 <69e28c910912210552p1f63a47dw9fbabf2c26ce02e9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1261971942.6037.57.camel@debian>
	 <69e28c910912281233v220e9896t5686111030d5f30@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 08:46:30 +0800
Message-ID: <1262047590.6037.85.camel@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Tue, 2009-12-29 at 04:33 +0800, Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> Doesn't the Windows driver use a completely different, thinner
> firmware (without all the regulatory hardening crap, as the driver
> itself is closed-source)? 

Yes, the Windows firmware doesn't have the regulatory handling. But
that's the only difference.

Thanks,
-yi