Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:53868 "HELO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753570AbZLMPSw (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:18:52 -0500 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2578669ewy.21 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 07:18:51 -0800 (PST) From: Ivo van Doorn To: Gertjan van Wingerde Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.33] rt2x00: Disable powersaving for rt61pci. Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:18:49 +0100 Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org References: <1260661180-2300-1-git-send-email-gwingerde@gmail.com> <200912131115.33485.IvDoorn@gmail.com> <4B250567.8050809@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4B250567.8050809@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200912131618.49312.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sunday 13 December 2009, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote: > On 12/13/09 11:15, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > > On Sunday 13 December 2009, Gertjan van Wingerde wrote: > >> We've had many reports of rt61pci failures with powersaving enabled. > >> Therefore, as a stop-gap measure, disable powersaving of the rt61pci > >> until we have found a proper solution. > > > > This disables powersaving completely, can't we set the default powersaving > > to disabled? That way for people for who it does work, it can still be enabled. > > > > Well, when I was looking into this I came up with a number of issues in the code > which makes me believe that it simply isn't working at all. > One example is that the rt61pci devices rely on handling the wakeup interrupt > by the driver to wake up the devices. As far as I can tell there is no handling > of the wakeup interrupt in the rt61pci driver. > That's why I decided to disable it all together, as I don't think it works > properly for anyone (although some people may not really notice it). Ok, but then please disable it for _all_ rt2x00 drivers, or at least all PCI rt2x00 drivers since they would have the same wakeup interrupt requirement. Ivo