Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:34758 "EHLO mail-iw0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755551AbZLCOrF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 09:47:05 -0500 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so920885iwn.33 for ; Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:47:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200912031200.56443.holgerschurig@gmail.com> References: <200912031148.46934.holgerschurig@gmail.com> <1259837682.12843.10.camel@johannes.local> <200912031200.56443.holgerschurig@gmail.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 06:46:51 -0800 Message-ID: <43e72e890912030646x458068acw814788cce20ea173@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: question regarding cfg80211 monitor modes To: Holger Schurig Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Holger Schurig wrote: >> I'd say don't bother with the flags at all. > > Okay, I'll then a mask of 0x07, turning everything on. If someone > doesn't like beacons, he can still use > >  tshark -R "!(wlan.fc.subtype == 8)" > > > > BTW: > http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/modes#Monitor_mode > doesn't say anything about the modes. The modes or the flags? iw does document the flags. Luis