Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]:59173 "EHLO mail-iw0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753830AbZLBWum convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:50:42 -0500 Received: by iwn1 with SMTP id 1so486001iwn.33 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:50:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20091128212102.GB28915@redhat.com> References: <20091128212102.GB28915@redhat.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:50:28 -0800 Message-ID: <43e72e890912021450t454dc740r91ea88365779d2c6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [internal-ath9k-devel] RHEL5.5 (and Centos 5.5!) wireless updates needs broad testing... To: "John W. Linville" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, centos@centos.org, ipw3945@lists.sourceforge.net, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:21 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > Greetings, > > RHEL5.5 is scheduled for a broad update of wireless LAN bits. > This includes updates to the cfg80211 and the mac80211 subsystems, > and the ath5k, iwl3945, iwl4965, iwl5000, rt2400pci, rt2500pci, > rt2500usb, rt61pci, rt73usb, rtl8180, and rtl8187 drivers, as well as > the addition of the iwl1000, and iwl6000 drivers and the core of the > rfkill subsystem.  For good measure, ath9k _may_ be added as well. > This represents a very large mass of code, and any extra testing is > most welcome. > > Preliminary RHEL5 kernels with these wireless bits are available here: > >        http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/rhel5/ > > I have been using them with iwl4965, iwl5000, iwl6000, and ath9k > hardware here with very satisfactory results.  I would appreciate > your help testing not only on this hardware but whatever other bits > of the aforementioned hardware that you may have. > > If you have a wireless LAN enabled box running RHEL5 (or CentOS 5 or > other equivalent) then please give these kernels a try.  When you find > problems, please open a bug against RHEL5.5 at bugzilla.redhat.com > and Cc: me on the bug.  Remember, the surest way to avoid a bug in > RHEL5.5 is to find it before it is released, and the surest way to > avoid a bug in CentOS is to keep it out of RHEL... :-) > > I appreciate your help! Thanks John, I'm keeping track of ath9k issues with regards to this kernel here: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k/RHEL5 If anyone else finds issues please add a link there. Luis