Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com ([209.85.220.225]:64928 "EHLO mail-fx0-f225.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932427Ab0AFXcy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2010 18:32:54 -0500 Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so11233045fxm.21 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:32:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <201001061650.52062.mb@bu3sch.de>

<69e28c911001061435v4b840588p3ead478672ba311@mail.gmail.com> <69e28c911001061449v3f58ce1vc4bfefcdbaf81fa2@mail.gmail.com> <4B4515CA.7050902@lwfinger.net> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_Stefanik?= Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 00:32:33 +0100 Message-ID: <69e28c911001061532t674c3b55q97a1b9dc4af23622@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] b43: N-PHY: implement b43_nphy_stay_in_carrier_search and it's calls (V2) To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rafa=B3_Mi=B3ecki?= Cc: Larry Finger , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "John W. Linville" , Michael Buesch , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:12 AM, Rafa? Mi?ecki wrote: > W dniu 6 stycznia 2010 23:59 u?ytkownik Larry Finger > napisa?: >> On 01/06/2010 04:49 PM, G?bor Stefanik wrote: >>> 2010/1/6 Rafa? Mi?ecki : >>>> W dniu 6 stycznia 2010 23:35 u?ytkownik G?bor Stefanik >>>> napisa?: >>>>> 2010/1/6 Rafa? Mi?ecki : >>>>>> V2: fix typo in deaf_count counting, improve b43_mac_[sr] calls, >>>>>> ? ?rename function. Thanks Michael! >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rafa? Mi?ecki >>>>>> --- >>>>>> ?drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.c | ? 58 >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> ?drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy_n.h | ? ?3 ++ >>>>>> ?2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Typo in title (it's vs. its) >>>> >>>> My gramma is far from perfect, thanks. >>> >>> I've yet to see a perfect grandmother... :-) >> >> My wife thinks she is perfect! > > What a one latter can change ;) > > -- > Rafa? > The the impotence of proofreading Has this ever happened to you? You work very very horde on a paper for English clash And you still get a very glow raid on it (like a D or even a D=) and all because you are the liverwurst spoiler in the whale wide word. Yes, proofreading your peppers is a matter of the the utmost impotence. Now, this is a problem that affects manly, manly students, all over the world. I myself was such a bed spiller once upon a term that my English torturer in my sophomoric year, Mrs. Myth, she said that I would never get into a good colleague. And that's all I wanted, that's all any kid wants at that age, just to get into a good colleague! And not just anal community colleague either, because I am not the kind of guy who would be happy at just anal community colleague. I need to be challenged. Challenged, menstrually. I needed a place that can offer me intellectual simulation. So I know this probably makes me sound like a stereo, but I really felt that I could get into an ivory legal colleague. So if I did not improvement then gone would be my dream of going to Harvard, Jail, or Prison (you know, in Prison, New Jersey). So I got myself a spell checker and figured I was on Sleazy Street. But there are several missed aches that a spell chukker can't can't catch catch. For instant, if you accidentally leave out word, your spell checker won't put it in you. And God for billing purposes only you should have serial problems with Tori Spelling your spell Chekhov might replace a word with one you had absolutely no detention of using. Because, I mean, what do you want it to douche? You know... No, it only does what you tell it to douche. You're the one who's sitting in front of the computer scream, with your hand on the mouth going clit, clit, clit. It just goes to show you how embargo one careless little clit of the mouth can be. Which reminds me of this one time during my Junior Mint. The teacher took the paper that I have written on A Sale of Two Titties. No, I'm cereal, I'm cereal. She read it out loud in front of all of my assmates. It was quite possibly one of the most humidifying experiences I've ever had, being laughed at, like that, pubicly. So do yourself a flavor and follow these two Pisces of advice: One: There is no prostitute for careful editing of your own work. No prostitute, whatsoever. And three: When it comes to proofreading, the red penis your friend. Spank you! (Credits go to Taylor Mali for this one.) -- Vista: [V]iruses, [I]ntruders, [S]pyware, [T]rojans and [A]dware. :-)