Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-yx0-f187.google.com ([209.85.210.187]:59716 "EHLO
	mail-yx0-f187.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751355Ab0AKQfk (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:35:40 -0500
Received: by yxe17 with SMTP id 17so20419426yxe.33
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:35:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B4B5359.4040605@lwfinger.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:35:37 -0600
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
CC: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ath5k on 2.6.32 suddenly fails
References: <201001101152.34316.mb@bu3sch.de> <43e72e891001110811u49ddb2d5qbc7bef3a7e3e76d1@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <43e72e891001110811u49ddb2d5qbc7bef3a7e3e76d1@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On 01/11/2010 10:11 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> or was this a regression against some random wireless-testing based
> snapshit (which seems to be the case).

Typo, or editorial comment on wireless-testing?

Larry