Return-path: Received: from web51401.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.180]:26699 "HELO web51401.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756744Ab0A2IK0 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 03:10:26 -0500 Message-ID: <256732.66854.qm@web51401.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:10:25 -0800 (PST) From: Joerg Pommnitz Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Significiant performance differences between ath5k and ath9k in 802.11a To: rootkit85@yahoo.it Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org In-Reply-To: <40101cc31001280812v19e78ad7m3cf04a7ff1851ce0@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --- rootkit85@yahoo.it wrote: > > Can you try in AP-client mode? I think you'll get more > throughput so. > No, IBSS is what I'm interested in. And the point is, that there is a 30% performance difference between ath5k (and Madwifi) and ath9k. Even if the performance in AP mode would be better, this does not change the problem in IBSS mode. Regards Joerg __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verf?gt ?ber einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com