Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:38939 "EHLO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752508Ab0ABHtI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:49:08 -0500 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so5747672ewy.21 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:49:07 -0800 (PST) To: Carl =?iso-8859-15?Q?F=FCrstenberg?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: libnl, bug question, and lib query References: <91f186a81001011507h48c1b887u323fe43dd4c8fdb1@mail.gmail.com> From: Kalle Valo Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:49:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <91f186a81001011507h48c1b887u323fe43dd4c8fdb1@mail.gmail.com> ("Carl =?iso-8859-15?Q?F=FCrstenberg=22's?= message of "Sat\, 2 Jan 2010 00\:07\:03 +0100") Message-ID: <878wchvte8.fsf@purkki.valot.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Carl F?rstenberg writes: > I'll start this up with three different question, hope that's not a > problem instead of sending three different mails. > > First I wonder if I should, in a production environment using the > nl80211, stick to use libnl 1.* or should I use use the git 2.0? I have heard that libnl 2.0 does not have stable API currently. So it's better to avoid it. -- Kalle Valo