Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-iw0-f197.google.com ([209.85.223.197]:44288 "EHLO
	mail-iw0-f197.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752323Ab0AKQnp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:43:45 -0500
Received: by iwn35 with SMTP id 35so14887000iwn.4
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:43:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4B4B5359.4040605@lwfinger.net>
References: <201001101152.34316.mb@bu3sch.de> <43e72e891001110811u49ddb2d5qbc7bef3a7e3e76d1@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B4B5359.4040605@lwfinger.net>
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:43:25 -0800
Message-ID: <43e72e891001110843k38e7c813he7378897772aa95a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ath5k on 2.6.32 suddenly fails
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> wrote:
> On 01/11/2010 10:11 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> or was this a regression against some random wireless-testing based
>> snapshit (which seems to be the case).
>
> Typo, or editorial comment on wireless-testing?

Hah big typo indeed, sorry about that.

  Luis