Return-path: Received: from mail.atheros.com ([12.36.123.2]:27339 "EHLO mail.atheros.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755126Ab0BYLHM (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Feb 2010 06:07:12 -0500 Received: from mail.atheros.com ([10.10.20.104]) by sidewinder.atheros.com for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:07:12 -0800 From: Sujith MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <19334.24140.564616.316014@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:56:04 +0530 To: Helmut Schaa CC: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , linux-wireless , Vasanth Thiagarajan Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k_htc: sync add_interface and remove_interface with mac80211 In-Reply-To: <201002251154.30917.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> References: <201002241633.47090.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> <43e72e891002240918i152253c9o8130dc507d2dc03@mail.gmail.com> <201002251154.30917.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Helmut Schaa wrote: > Am Mittwoch 24 Februar 2010 schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez: > > Thanks! Applied and pushed out. I should note, since no one else has, > > that ath9k_htc has gotten a huge face lift by now. Unfortunately the > > entire new revamp was done through an internal private tree but from > > what I gather submission upstream should happen soon. > > Does it make much sense then to hack on the driver right now? > Should linux-wireless be CC'ed as well for ath9k_htc patches? We would be making a submission soon, as soon as a few internal tests are run. I would think that holding off work on the public ath9k_htc tree would be good. Patches are always welcome for the driver after the submission. :) Sujith