Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2634 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752373Ab0BVNzE (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:55:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 14:52:58 +0100 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Reinette Chatre Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iwlwifi fixes for 2.6.33 and stable Message-ID: <20100222135256.GF2520@dhcp-lab-161.englab.brq.redhat.com> References: <1266623253-31673-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1266623253-31673-1-git-send-email-reinette.chatre@intel.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 03:47:31PM -0800, Reinette Chatre wrote: > I am excluding "iwlwifi: set HT flags after channel in rxon" from this > resend since it has been merged into wireless-2.6 already. > > We address > http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2160 where it can be > seen that there are instances where the number of freed tfds are negative, > which is triggered by the receipt of a TX response with incorrect frame > control. For user perspective this make network dies (no possibility to send any data) without any error in dmesg. > We include two patches to (1) prevent the problem from > occuring, and (2) prevent the problem from propagating when it does occur. I confirm patches fix the issue. Tested on 2.6.33-rc8 and 2.6.32. For .32 patch (2) does not apply, I had to change it. I'll send modified patch in next email. Cheers Stanislaw