Return-path: Received: from cluster-d.mailcontrol.com ([85.115.60.190]:40418 "EHLO cluster-d.mailcontrol.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752049Ab0BLStP (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:49:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4B75A271.7010705@csr.com> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:48:17 +0000 From: David Vrabel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "John W. Linville" CC: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Marcel Holtmann , linux-wireless , linux-bluetooth , Dan Tian , Kevin Hayes Subject: Re: Coordinating development for Bluetooth 3.0 between 802.11 and BT trees References: <43e72e891002111210l55d6a802pc5a1384e3535c845@mail.gmail.com> <20100212183309.GB4983@tuxdriver.com> In-Reply-To: <20100212183309.GB4983@tuxdriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: John W. Linville wrote: > > In any case, I was under the impression that at least the initial > parts of the 802.11 AMP implementation could happen independently > from any bluetooth stack changes...? You should be able to do (almost) all of the AMP PAL development and testing without a Bluetooth stack. David -- David Vrabel, Senior Software Engineer, Drivers CSR, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Tel: +44 (0)1223 692562 Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ http://www.csr.com/ Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom