Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:48864 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751543Ab0BHVAy (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:00:54 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:55:04 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Dan Williams Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, Chris Siebenmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] airo: fix setting zero length WEP key Message-ID: <20100208205503.GB3852@tuxdriver.com> References: <1265121290-2969-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <20100204120713.GB6068@dhcp-lab-161.englab.brq.redhat.com> <1265353178.11066.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1265353178.11066.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:59:38PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > John, can we revert the patch you applied, and apply the following patch > instead (in the next mail)? I'd rather use the one I'm about to send > because it makes it clearer *why* setting the TX key index is required, > and it limits that case to only the time when it's necessary. Pending > the testing by Chris, I'd rather have the revised version committed > instead. Do you still want this don, even after Chris's testing says your patch doesn't work? I wasn't sure from your response. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.