Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:53425 "EHLO mail-ew0-f219.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756899Ab0BDEwh (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:52:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B620A72.7050202@gmail.com> References: <43e72e891001281338u5f05307ble5360c3dac6ab9a2@mail.gmail.com> <4B620A72.7050202@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 04:52:36 +0000 Message-ID: <3ace41891002032052h13be767buabb77523c0cc2d90@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Linux wireless GSoC 2010 project ideas From: Hin-Tak Leung To: Till Kamppeter Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linux-wireless , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 1/28/10, Till Kamppeter wrote: > Great to hear from you. > > I will apply again for the LF entering as a mentoring organization and I > will add your projects to the list of proposed projects for the LF > application. Perhaps at this point, it might be a good idea to share some insights for reasons of failures/non-competition. I think the first year (2008) of LF's participation, it was 6/8 competion over all? How did 2009 do? Luis mentioned that 2/3 failed out of the 3 wireless-related project, but AFAIK there were about 10 accepted in 2009 under the LF umbrella - what's the completion rate for the other 7? It is probably a good idea to write some of that up (non-competition and the possibility of re-do) in one of Linux Foundation's wiki pages. AFAIK the overall non-competition rate across all organization is about 10% so the 2/8 in 2008 wasn't too bad. > P. S.: Do you know someone with knowledge in data compression? I will > run a project at OpenPrinting which is about data compression. What are you thinking of? :-) Hin-Tak